FINGDINGS AND DISCUSSON
A.
Findings
As stated in the previous chapter that the instrument
used in this research was an objective test, and it is aim was to find out the
ability of students to translate English paragraph through jigsaw learning
strategy. After doing research at the second year students of Madrasah Aliyah
Babussalam DDI Kassi Jeneponto with the number of sample, data those are got
from the test has analyzed by the researcher to know students’ ability to
translate English paragraph.
In order to know the students’ ability to translate
English paragraph through jigsaw learning strategy, the raw scores of the
students were tabulated firstly.
Table 1,
Rate percentage of
students score through the objective test
(Class
II IPSA)
No
|
Classification
|
Score
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
1
|
Excellent
|
9.6 – 10
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
Very good
|
8.6 – 9.5
|
5
|
17,9%
|
3
|
Good
|
7.6 – 8.5
|
10
|
35,.7%
|
4
|
Fairly good
|
6.6 –7.5
|
10
|
35,.7%
|
5
|
Fair
|
5.6 – 6.5
|
2
|
7,1%
|
6
|
Poor
|
3.6 – 5.5
|
1
|
3,6%
|
7
|
Very poor
|
0 – 3.5
|
0
|
0%
|
Total
|
18
|
100%
|
33
|
Table
above shows that none (0%) of the students gained excellent score, 5 (17,8%) of the students gained very
good,Score 10 (35,.7%) of the students gained good
score, 10 (35,.7%) of the students
gained fairly good score, 2 (7,1%) of the students gained fair score, 1 (3,6%) of students gained poor
score, and none (0%) of the students gained very poor score.
Formula; P
=
Very Good
Good:
Fairly good:
Fair:
Poor:
Excellent and very poor = 0%
Table 2,
The
category of students score through the test
(Class
II IPSA)
No
|
Student’s Code
|
Number of Items
|
Row
score
|
Category
|
1
|
A
|
4
|
9
|
very
good
|
2
|
B
|
4
|
6.5
|
fair
|
3
|
C
|
4
|
7
|
Fairly
good
|
4
|
D
|
4
|
5
|
poor
|
5
|
E
|
4
|
7.5
|
fairly
good
|
6
|
F
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
7
|
G
|
4
|
8
|
good
|
8
|
H
|
4
|
8
|
good
|
9
|
I
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
10
|
J
|
4
|
7
|
Fairly good
|
11
|
K
|
4
|
5.5
|
Poor
|
12
|
L
|
4
|
8.5
|
good
|
13
|
M
|
4
|
6.5
|
fair
|
14
|
N
|
4
|
8
|
good
|
15
|
O
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
16
|
P
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
17
|
Q
|
4
|
8
|
good
|
18
|
R
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
19
|
S
|
4
|
8.5
|
good
|
20
|
T
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
21
|
U
|
4
|
9
|
very
good
|
22
|
V
|
4
|
7
|
Fairly
good
|
23
|
W
|
4
|
8
|
good
|
24
|
X
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
25
|
Y
|
4
|
6.5
|
fair
|
26
|
Z
|
4
|
8
|
good
|
27
|
A1
|
4
|
8
|
good
|
28
|
B1
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
Total
|
28
|
4
|
209
|
Where: Total of row score = 209
Number
of sample = 128
In finding out the
second year students’ of II IPSA mean score,
the writer applied the following formula:
X =
Where: X
= Mean score
= Total of
row score
N = Number of sample
Calculation:
X = 209
28
= 7.5
The calculation above shows that
the mean score of the students’ ability is (7.5). Based on the classification
above, the mean score of the second year students of II IPSA was
categorized as fairly good. This means that the second year students of II IPSA
of Madrasah Aliyah Babussalam DDI Kassi Jeneponto have fairly good ability in
translating English paragraph through jigsaw learning strategy.
Table
3,
Rate percentage of students score through the
objective test
(Class II IPSB)
No
|
Classification
|
Score
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
1
|
Excellent
|
9.6 – 10
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
Very good
|
8.6 – 9.5
|
0
|
0%
|
3
|
Good
|
7.6 – 8.5
|
6
|
27.28
%
|
4
|
Fairly good
|
6.6 –7.5
|
7
|
31,82 %
|
5
|
Fair
|
5.6 – 6.5
|
8
|
36.36
%
|
6
|
Poor
|
3.6 – 5.5
|
1
|
4.54
%
|
7
|
Very poor
|
0 – 3.5
|
0
|
0%
|
Total
|
22
|
100%
|
Table
above shows that 0
(0%) of the students gained excellent and very good score, 6 (27.28 %) of the students gained good score, 7 (31,82%) of the students gained fairly
good score, 8 (36.36
%) of the students gained fair score, 1 (4.54 %) of students gained poor
score, and 0 (0%) of the students gained
very poor score.
Formula; P = F x 100%
N
Good:
Fairly good:
Fair:
Poor:
Excellent, and very poor = 0%
Table 4,
The category of
students score through the test
(Class II IPSB)
No
|
Student’s Code
|
Number of Paragraph
|
Row Score
|
Category
|
1
|
A
|
4
|
7
|
Fairy
good
|
2
|
B
|
4
|
6.5
|
Fair
|
3
|
C
|
4
|
5.5
|
poor
|
4
|
D
|
4
|
7
|
Fairly
good
|
5
|
E
|
4
|
6
|
Fair
|
6
|
F
|
4
|
5
|
poor
|
7
|
G
|
4
|
6.5
|
fair
|
8
|
H
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
9
|
I
|
4
|
6.5
|
Fair
|
10
|
J
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
11
|
K
|
4
|
8
|
good
|
12
|
L
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
13
|
M
|
4
|
6
|
Fair
|
14
|
N
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
15
|
O
|
4
|
7
|
Fairly
good
|
16
|
P
|
4
|
6.5
|
Fair
|
17
|
Q
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
18
|
R
|
4
|
5.5
|
poor
|
19
|
S
|
4
|
9
|
very
good
|
20
|
U
|
4
|
6.5
|
fair
|
21
|
V
|
4
|
8
|
good
|
22
|
W
|
4
|
7.5
|
Fairly
good
|
Total
|
22
|
152
|
Where: Total of row score = 152
Number of sample = 22
In
finding out the second year students’ of II IPSB mean score, the writer applied the following formula:
X =
Where: X
= Mean score
= Total of
row score
N = Number of sample
Calculation:
X = 152 = 6.92
22
The calculation above
shows that the mean score of the students’ ability is (6.92). Based on the
classification above, the mean score of the second year students of II IPSB was categorized as fairly good. This means that the
second year students of II IPSB of Madrasah Aliyah Babussalam DDI
Kassi Jeneponto have fairly good ability in translating english paragraph through jigsaw
learning strategy.
Table
5,
Rate percentage of
the total number of second year students’ score through the objective test
(Class II IPSA
and II IPSB)
No
|
Classification
|
Score
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
1
|
Excellent
|
9.6 – 10
|
0
|
0%
|
2
|
Very good
|
8.6 – 9.5
|
5
|
10%
|
3
|
Good
|
7.6 – 8.5
|
16
|
32%
|
4
|
Fairly good
|
6.6 –7.5
|
17
|
34%
|
5
|
Fair
|
5.6 – 6.5
|
10
|
20%
|
6
|
Poor
|
3.6 – 5.5
|
2
|
4%
|
7
|
Very poor
|
0 – 3.5
|
0
|
0%
|
Total
|
50
|
100%
|
Table
above shows that 0
(0%) of the students gained excellent score, 5 (10%) of the
students gained
very good, 16 (31%) of the students gained
good score, 17 (34%) of the students gained
fairly good score, 10 (20%) of the students gained fair score, 2 (4%) of students gained poor
score, and 0 (0%) of the students gained
very poor score.
Table 6,
The mean score of total number of the second year students
(Class II IPSA and Class II IPSB)
Class
|
Total
Number of Students
|
Students’
Row Score
|
II IPSA
|
28
|
209
|
II
IPSB
|
22
|
152
|
Total
|
50
|
361
|
Where: Total of row score = 361
Total Number of sample = 50
In finding out the
mean score of the second year students of II IPSA
and II IPSB, the writer applied the following formula:
X =
Where: X
= the mean score
= Total of
row score
N = Number of sample
Calculation:
X = 361
= 7.22
50
The calculation above
shows that the mean score of the second year students’ ability is (7.22). Based on the
classification above, the mean score of the second year students was
categorized as fairly good. This means that the second year students of Madrasah
Aliyah Babussalam DDI Kassi Jeneponto have fairly good ability in translating
english paragraph through jigsaw learning strategy.
B. Discussion
This section relates
to the discussion of data analysis. This section is aimed at describing the
students’ ability to translate English paragraph through jigsaw learning
strategy as follows:
The result of data
analysis above indicates that the students’ ability in translating English
paragraph through jigsaw learning strategy is as follows:
a.
The ability of the
second year students of class II IPSA to translate English
paragraph through jigsaw learning strategy is fairly good. It is showed by the
total mean score of the students is (7.5).
b.
The ability of the second year students of class II IPSB to translate English
paragraph through jigsaw learning strategy is fairly good, it is showed by the
total mean score of the students is (6.92).
c.
The second year students of
class II IPSA have a greater score than the second year
students of II IPSB.
d.
The ability of the total number of the second year
students to translate English paragraph through jigsaw learning strategy is
fairly good; it is showed by the total mean score of the students is (7.22).
Based on the
description of the students’ ability above, although the second students’ score
of class II IPSA is
greater than the second year students’
score of class II IPSB,
but The ability of the total number of the second year students to
translate English paragraph through jigsaw learning strategy is still categorized fairly good. It is showed
by the total mean score of the students is (7.22).
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar